I hold a belief.
I have spent time finding out what it is I think, what I feel, & what seems
to make sense. I suppose you could say I've always held a belief, technically
that’s true. I mean, as a child I believed that there was a world out there. As
I grew, I learned about God and believed in him. Later on that there are
spirits/souls out there without a suit of their own. As I became a teen I
started to ask ‘why’ after some hard times occurred. From the very beginning,
we all hold a belief. Even NOT believing is a belief in its own right. (Please
note that I’ll write something up on that last part later. There is a bit of
obscurity on that one. Wording is key, as is with anything.)
Having a belief
then, doesn't mean much. As with many things, it is the substance that has
value. What do you believe? What then… are you? Oddly the belief itself often
comes second to the categorization of it. The category is a bit ambiguous. What
I might consider to work, others might not. A category has a rule on what makes
it so, yet there is always grey area. A poster in my mailbox is still IN my mailbox
even if half is hanging out. It fulfills the category even with something
leftover.
This is how I
view religions… well “organized” religions. I don’t know if there is a
difference between ‘Organized Religion’ & simply saying ‘Religion’. They’re
used the same. “What’s your religion?” is just short for, “What organization of
religion are you a part of?” That is something I wonder about. Why the need for
classification and what does it mean if you lack the ‘required’ organization.
I’m a Spiritualist if I *need* to be defined, but what of the Catholics,
Muslims, Jewish, Hindus, or Non-denominational groups? And to take two of those
a step further, what of Christians (Non-denominational & Catholics)?
All of these
groupings have a familiarity attached to them. Anyone that is a member has
common attributes, or rather common beliefs. While there are common thoughts
within a religion; it is another thing to say ALL thoughts are common among
them. We all have differences in our beliefs due to our own perceptions. This
makes the idea of a ‘One True Religion’ a hard concept. If all Christians have
slightly different thoughts about all the nuances that makes someone Christian,
then how can Christianity be 100% correct?... when it isn't agreed upon
completely by its subscribers. It doesn't falsify any truths within mind you.
Just as science has known facts… new knowledge can change those facts yet still
hold the truths outside of the changed concept. The same holds true for
Spiritual Knowledge.
One of the
biggest issues I have with organized religion is the idea of worship. Simply
put, I refuse it. I refuse to worship someone(/thing) simply because they are
superior to me in some way. If someone wants my respect they’re welcome to have
it. But worship? I don’t deal well with people that expect or need to be looked
up to. In my mind ALL are equal. All are on a level playing field: Gods, advanced
races, ourselves, & dogs… past all of our physical selves, we’re equal.
Nothing will get my submission simply because. To me, a god or driving energy
should be something close, something personal. I would rather view a god as a
best friend than something I’m unworthy to look upon. If you've ever made a
friend out of a boss or parent, then this concept should be easy to understand.
Although I’m not
fond of labeling faiths, I’ll admit that it does aid in a basic understanding
of another’s beliefs. With a label, one can easily state a lot of information
in a word or phrase. Even as a self-described Spiritualist, there is still
meaning. Positive meaning. What we could do without are labels that aren't so
positive or simply are too vague. Pagan is one such word… told to the world
that Non-Christians are Pagan. There are many Powerful & Personal beliefs
that are swept under this term. How about instead of having a world where we
find the ‘One True Religion’, we embrace all religions, learn all religions, and
discover the greater truths that are nigh impossible to decipher on our own?
Dear Joe,
ReplyDeleteYou write well and I don't have much to comment.
You said " you may respect somebody but you will not worship". To me "respect" and "worship" are same with a difference in their acuteness. "Worship" is unquestioned ( blind) respect. We may say that worship is superlative of respect.
Interesting view. I saw the comment and looked up the term itself. You're correct in how it's used. I come from a Catholic background. While it may be used correctly there as well, it's not what I took from it. It felt like an undying submission due to god being god and me... not. I never felt it was explained to me more than that and over time felt the word to be.. too much. Interesting to see that through it all, my thoughts were still in line with the idea even if I didn't understand the word. And in that, hopefully I can come to accept the word in the future. At least it's not a word I immensely dislike anymore.
ReplyDelete